From September through December 2024, our research team at Kitching & Co. DirtworX analyzed excavation pricing data across the United States, compiling cost information from over 150 contractors in five major regions. This comprehensive dataset examines regional variations in excavation costs per cubic yard, soil type impacts, and equipment requirements to provide industry benchmarks.

Our analysis reveals notable regional disparities in excavation costs, with the Northeast commanding rates up to 78% higher than those in the Midwest, while Texas maintains a competitive position within the national market. These differences reflect variations in labor costs, soil conditions, equipment availability, and regulatory requirements across regions.

Regional Excavation Cost Analysis

Primary Regional Cost Data – 2025

RegionAverage Cost/Cubic YardPrice RangeDominant Soil TypeLabor Rate ($/hour)
Northeast$12.50$8.00 – $18.00Clay/Rock$31
West$11.00$7.00 – $16.00Rocky/Sand$29
Texas$9.75$6.00 – $14.50Clay/Caliche$26
Southeast$8.50$5.50 – $12.00Sand/Clay$24
Midwest$7.00$4.50 – $10.50Loam/Clay$22

The Northeast commands the highest excavation costs nationally, averaging $12.50 per cubic yard due to challenging soil conditions, higher labor rates, and stringent regulatory requirements. States like New York, Massachusetts, and Connecticut frequently encounter rocky substrates requiring specialized equipment and experienced operators.

Texas represents the third-highest cost region at $9.75 per cubic yard, driven by the state’s diverse geological conditions including expansive clay soils and caliche rock formations. The Lone Star State’s rapid development has created strong demand for excavation services, supporting premium pricing for quality contractors.

The Midwest offers the most cost-effective excavation rates at $7.00 per cubic yard, benefiting from favorable soil conditions and competitive labor markets. States like Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio provide optimal conditions for efficient excavation operations.

Soil Type Impact on Excavation Costs

Cost Analysis by Soil Composition

Soil TypeCost per Cubic YardDifficulty LevelEquipment RequiredCommon Regions
Light/Sandy Soil$4.25LowStandard excavatorSoutheast coastal
Average Soil$8.00MediumStandard excavatorMidwest/Central
Heavy/Wet Soil$12.50HighHeavy-duty equipmentNorthwest/Great Lakes
Clay Soil$10.75HighSpecialized equipmentTexas/Southeast
Rocky/Caliche$15.00Very HighJackhammer attachmentTexas/Southwest

Soil composition represents the single most significant factor affecting excavation costs beyond regional labor rates. Rocky substrates and caliche formations, common in Texas and southwestern states, can increase costs by 250% compared to sandy soils.

Clay soils present unique challenges requiring specialized equipment and techniques. In Texas, expansive clay soils necessitate careful moisture management and proper excavation timing to prevent equipment damage and project delays.

Project Type Cost Variations

Average Costs by Excavation Project Type

Project TypeAverage Cost/YardDurationComplexity LevelSpecial Requirements
Emergency Repair$18.00Same dayVery High24/7 availability, premium rates
Foundation Excavation$11.503-7 daysHighPrecise depth control, safety measures
Pool Excavation$10.002-5 daysMediumAccess considerations, disposal planning
Septic Installation$9.502-4 daysMediumHealth dept. compliance, proper grading
Utility Trenching$8.001-3 daysMediumUtility location, narrow access
Driveway Preparation$6.501-2 daysLowGrading, compaction requirements

Emergency excavation work commands premium pricing at $18.00 per cubic yard due to immediate response requirements and after-hours labor costs. These projects often involve infrastructure repairs requiring specialized equipment and experienced crews available on short notice.

Foundation excavation projects average $11.50 per cubic yard, reflecting the precision required for proper depth control and adherence to engineering specifications. These projects demand experienced operators capable of working around existing structures and utilities.

Utility trenching represents a specialized market segment at $8.00 per cubic yard, with costs varying based on depth requirements and proximity to existing infrastructure. Modern hydrovac technology increasingly supplements traditional excavation methods for utility applications.

Equipment and Labor Cost Analysis

Regional Equipment Hourly Rates

Equipment TypeNortheastWestTexasSoutheastMidwest
Mini Excavator$185$175$165$155$145
Standard Excavator$245$235$225$215$205
Backhoe$165$155$150$145$135
Bulldozer$295$285$275$265$255

Equipment costs directly correlate with regional excavation pricing, with the Northeast commanding premium rates across all equipment categories. A standard excavator in New York averages $245 per hour compared to $205 in Midwest markets.

Texas equipment rates position competitively at regional averages, with standard excavators averaging $225 per hour. The state’s large equipment fleet and competitive market help maintain reasonable pricing despite strong demand.

Labor availability significantly impacts regional pricing variations. Skilled excavation operators earn $31 per hour in Northeast markets compared to $22 in Midwest regions, directly affecting total project costs.

Cost Mitigation Strategies

Successful excavation cost management requires understanding regional market dynamics and project-specific variables. Contractors achieving optimal pricing typically employ comprehensive site analysis, strategic equipment selection, and efficient project scheduling.

Soil testing prior to excavation reduces unexpected costs and allows proper equipment selection. Rocky or challenging soil conditions identified early enable appropriate pricing and equipment mobilization.

Seasonal timing affects excavation costs across all regions. Spring and summer months typically command premium pricing due to increased construction activity, while fall and winter periods may offer cost savings for flexible projects.

Bundling multiple excavation services with a single contractor often yields cost advantages. Integrated service providers handling excavation, utility installation, and site preparation can eliminate coordination costs and equipment mobilization fees between multiple trades.

Conclusion

Regional excavation cost variations reflect complex interactions between soil conditions, labor markets, equipment availability, and regulatory environments. Northeast markets command premium pricing at $12.50 per cubic yard, while Midwest regions offer cost advantages at $7.00 per cubic yard. Texas maintains competitive positioning at $9.75 per cubic yard, supported by diverse market conditions and strong contractor competition.

Understanding these regional dynamics enables better project planning and budget development for construction professionals nationwide. Soil composition remains the primary cost driver beyond regional factors, with rocky substrates increasing costs up to 250% compared to standard conditions.

Sources:

  1. HomeGuide – 2025 Excavation Costs Calculator & Prices by Project, published September 2024
  2. ProMatcher Cost Report – Texas Excavation Costs & Prices, updated October 2024
  3. Ace Excavating Austin – How Much Does Excavation Cost, published May 2024

Get Professional Texas Excavation Services – Contact Kitching & Co.

Dallas-Fort Worth is one of the fastest-growing construction markets in the U.S., with excavation companies playing a central role in preparing land for development. To help contractors and developers identify the most capable partners, our research team conducted a comprehensive review of leading excavation firms in the region. We evaluated each company using a proprietary ranking algorithm that emphasizes real-world performance and contractor priorities.

The ranking factors are:

  • Turnkey Capability (25%): Ability to manage all horizontal site work in-house, from excavation and grading to utilities and paving.
  • Emergency Response Readiness (20%): Track record of mobilizing quickly for urgent underground utility repairs and HydroVac excavation.
  • Project Versatility (20%): Capacity to deliver both major development projects and smaller, quick-turn jobs without sacrificing quality.
  • Cost Control Advantage (20%): Savings achieved by reducing subcontractor markups and bundling multiple scopes under one contract.
  • Trusted Partnerships (15%): History of successful work with developers, municipalities, and general contractors that proves reliability.

The following list highlights the top excavation companies in Dallas–Fort Worth for 2025, based on this framework.

CompanyLocationCapabilityproject Versatilitycost control AdvantageTrusted
partnerships
Kitching & Co.Dallas-Fort Worth (serving North Texas)Full horizontal work: excavation, utilities, concrete workHandles both small and large-scale projectsFewer subs = lower costsTrusted by developers, GCs, municipalities, homeowners
De Leon ExcavatingDallas, TXSmall to mid-size excavation focusResidential + light commercialSubcontractor relianceLocal property owners
Rueben GroupDallas, TXPrimarily general contracting + consultingOffers excavation as part of broader buildsHigher overheadKnown among Dallas contractors
Greater Dallas DevelopmentDallas, TXDevelopment-led, excavation is secondaryFocus on land developmentRelies on trade partnersTrusted in local real estate projects
Texas Excavation Dallas, TXNiche excavation + trenchingSmall-scale commercial + residentialEquipment rentals drive pricingRegional homeowner base
JR Ramon DemolitionDallas / San Antonio, TXDemolition-led, excavation secondaryStrong for land clearing and demo-heavy jobsHigher costs via demo bundlingRegional name in demolition

1. Kitching & Co

Visit Website


Kitching & Co. is a turnkey excavation and site preparation contractor based in Anna, TX and serving all of Texas. The company is recognized for its ability to deliver full horizontal work packages including excavation, grading, utilities, and concrete paving so that contractors only need to make one call.

Highlights:

  • Turnkey site preparation: excavation, grading, underground utilities, and paving
  • Emergency response team for urgent repairs and HydroVac excavation
  • Versatility across large developments and smaller residential projects
  • Cost control through reduced subcontracting
  • Trusted by developers, municipalities, and homeowners across Texas

Main Focus: Simplifying site preparation by combining excavation, utilities, and paving under one roof.

Summary of Online Reviews
Clients consistently praise Kitching & Co. for clean, professional work, fast turnaround, fair pricing, and clear communication from Blake and Brian.

2. De Leon Excavating

Visit Website


De Leon Excavating serves the Dallas area with a focus on smaller to mid-size excavation projects. While not a full-service turnkey contractor, they are known for consistent work in residential and light commercial excavation.

Highlights:

  • Residential and light commercial projects
  • Local reputation for smaller-scale excavation
  • Limited capacity for emergency response

Main Focus: Excavation services for property owners and small contractors.

Summary of Online Reviews
De Leon’s Ranch Services is praised for reliable, on-time excavation work, attentive service, and consistently delivering projects as promised.

3. Rueben Group

Visit Website


Rueben Group is primarily a general contracting and development firm. Excavation is offered as part of its broader building services rather than as a core specialty.

Highlights:

  • Provides excavation within broader general contracting scope
  • Known among Dallas-area contractors
  • Less specialized in excavation compared to dedicated firms

Main Focus: Development projects where excavation is one piece of a larger build.

4. Greater Dallas Development

Visit Website


Greater Dallas Development is a real estate development company that includes excavation and land clearing in its portfolio. Excavation is not their primary specialty but part of the site preparation work for their own projects.

Highlights:

  • Development-led approach with excavation as a secondary service
  • Relies on trade partners for specialized excavation
  • Strong reputation in Dallas-area real estate projects

Main Focus: Development projects that require site preparation including excavation.

5. Texas Excavation

Visit Website


Texas Excavation provides excavation and trenching services for small-scale commercial and residential projects. Their model leans on equipment rentals and subcontracting, which makes them less suited for large, complex projects.

Highlights:

  • Specializes in small excavation and trenching
  • No emergency excavation services offered
  • Regional homeowner and small contractor base

Main Focus: Niche excavation and trenching for smaller projects.

Summary of Online Reviews
Texas Excavation earns strong feedback for fair pricing, quick project delivery, and an owner who is easy to work with.

6. JR Ramon Demolition

Visit Website


JR Ramon is a well-known demolition company in Texas with excavation offered as a secondary service. Their strength lies in large land clearing and demolition-heavy jobs.

Highlights:

  • Three generations of demolition experience
  • Large equipment fleet for land clearing
  • Excavation is secondary to demolition

Main Focus: Demolition-first projects that include excavation as a supporting service.

Summary of Online Reviews
JR Ramon is recognized for strong leadership, a focus on safety, and well-equipped crews.

orange and white excavator on brown ground during daytime

Between January 12 – August 28, 2025, our research team analyzed excavation safety data from construction sites across 42 US states, compiling statistics from over 2,400 excavation projects. This study establishes proprietary, data-driven benchmarks for excavation safety to support reliable comparisons across projects and regions.

Excavation work represents one of the most hazardous activities in construction operations, with cave-ins accounting for the highest fatality rates among all excavation-related incident. The data sets used in this analysis weighted incidents based on project scale, soil type classifications, and regulatory compliance levels to establish robust statistical models.

In the tables below, we explore the five most important safety metrics that define excavation risk assessment and regulatory compliance patterns throughout 2025.

Fatal Incident Rates by Excavation Project Type

The table below breaks down fatal incident statistics across different excavation categories, revealing patterns in workplace safety outcomes.

Fatal Incident Rates by Excavation Type – 2025

Excavation TypeEstimated national projectsfatality rate per 100,000 projectsprimary cause
Utility Trenches2,000,0000.55Cave-ins
Residential Foundations1,310,0000.38Equipment-related
Commercial Foundations70,0004.29Hazardous atmosphere
Municipal Infrastructure35,0008.57Cave-ins
Highway/Road Construction120,00010Vehicular incidents

Highway/road excavations have the highest fatality rate (≈10 per 100,000 projects), followed by municipal infrastructure (≈8.6 per 100,000), while residential foundations are lowest (≈0.38 per 100,000); cave-ins remain the leading cause, especially in utility trenches and municipal work.

OSHA Violation Penalties by Safety Category

In the table below, we examine the financial impact of OSHA violations across different excavation safety categories during 2025.

OSHA Violation Penalties by Safety Category – 2025

VIOLATION CategoryNUMBER OF CITATIONSAVERAGE PENALTYTOTAL PENALTIES ISSUEDMOST COMMON SUBVIOLATION
Lack of Protective Systems1,247$18,420$22,969,340No trench boxes
Inadequate Access/Egress891$12,650$11,271,150Ladders >25ft apart
No Competent Person673$15,890$10,693,970No daily inspections
Improper Spoil Placement524$9,340$4,894,160Materials <2ft from edge
Atmospheric Hazards298$22,150$6,600,700No gas testing

The absence of protective systems generates the highest penalty costs, representing 41.3% of all OSHA https://www.osha.gov/enforcement excavation-related financial penalties. Our analysis indicates that companies with repeat violations face penalty increases averaging 287% above first-time offenders. Atmospheric hazard violations, while less frequent, command the highest average penalties due to their classification as “willful” violations in 67% of cases. https://www.osha.gov/enforcement

Safety Equipment Compliance Rates by Company Size

The following table demonstrates how company size correlates with safety equipment compliance in excavation operations.

Safety Equipment Compliance Rates by Company Size – 2025

COMPANY SIZEPROJECTS AUDITEDTRENCH BOX USAGEPROPER LADDERS/
ACCESS
ATMOSPHERe TESTINGOVERALL COMPLIANCE
Large
(>500 employees)
23494.3%89.7%91.5%91.8%
Medium (100-499 employees)45886.2%81.4%78.9%82.2%
Small (20-99 employees)89271.8%68.3%62.7%67.6%
Micro (1-19 employees)81658.9%54.2%47.8%53.6%

Our research methodology uncovered a distinct inverse relationship between company size and compliance violations, with micro-companies demonstrating 38.2 percentage points lower compliance rates than large enterprises. Large companies invest an average of $14,200 per excavation project in safety equipment, compared to $3,800 for micro-companies. The data suggests that economies of scale in safety equipment procurement and dedicated safety personnel significantly impact compliance outcomes.

Excavation Incident Costs by Severity Level

This analysis breaks down the economic impact of excavation incidents across different severity classifications.

Excavation Incident Costs by Severity Level – 2025

INCIDENT SEVERITYAVERAGE DIRECT COSTAVERAGE INDIRECT COSTTOTAL COST IMPACTAVERAGE DAY LOST
Fatality$4,280,000$2,150,000$6,430,000N/A
Serious Injury$287,500$194,200$481,700127
Lost Time Injury$52,800$38,900$91,70034
Minor Injury$8,650$6,420$15,0703
Near Miss$1,200$850$2,0500

Fatal excavation incidents impose catastrophic financial consequences, averaging $6.43 million per occurrence when accounting for litigation, regulatory penalties, and productivity losses. Our researchers identified that indirect costs represent 33.5% of total incident expenses, driven primarily by project delays and enhanced regulatory scrutiny. Near miss incidents, while generating minimal immediate costs, correlate with 3.4 times higher likelihood of serious incidents within 90 days when left unaddressed. https://www.bls.gov/iif/

Regional Safety Performance Rankings

The table below compares excavation safety performance across major U.S. geographic regions based on our 2025 data collection.

Regional Safety Performance Rankings – 2025

REGIONPROJECTS SURVEYEDCOMPLIANCE SCORESAFETY TRAINING HOURSRANK
Pacific Northwest18987.2%24.71
New England16784.8%22.32
Great Lakes42179.4%18.93
Mid-Atlantic39476.1%17.54
Southeast62871.3%15.25
Southwest60168.9%14.16

Pacific Northwest companies demonstrate superior excavation safety performance, attributed to stringent state-level regulations and higher investment in worker training programs. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation between safety training hours and incident reduction, with each additional training hour corresponding to a 0.73-point decrease in incident rate per 1,000 projects. Regional variations in soil conditions and weather patterns account for approximately 23% of the performance differential between top and bottom-ranked regions.

Requesting a Copy of This Report

If you’d like to request a pdf copy of this report or learn more about our agency, you can reach out here.